🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is pursuing damages amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a direct warning from the Kremlin against plans to utilize frozen Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

EU leaders are set to determine in the coming days regarding a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. This scheme involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and financial stability.

Most of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary custodian for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union officials have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the principle that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any use of the funds as theft. Authorities have warned of reciprocal actions, such as confiscating European corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Wider Implications

In comments interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past stated it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in EU countries are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that such assets can be located," stated a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities said they are developing measures to deter other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the complex scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Kyiv would only be required to repay the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense damage inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different approach for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, demands unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the reparations loan as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear message that if you do all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."