🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an celebration that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has taken on a corporate feel, expanding to include gatherings where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The surge has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The observance has evolved since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is observed is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels emboldened to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A effort to scrub the history of people of color and legacy from the historical documents is under way. One of the political figure's first executive orders targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how little it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the conditions of the current era. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. Denise Miller, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an foundation that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not avoid political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What use is basic knowledge of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of far-right rallies in the street? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and alertness to subtle slights, but confronted with the risks that impact society if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is necessary – Black History is Now Month.